Craig Wright's Counsel Hits Back at COPA's Fraud Allegations in Closing Argument
Craig Wright’s legal team deprived the Crypto Amenable Patent Alliance’s arguments in its closing conversation Wednesday.
COPA took Wright to court last month to attempt and verify he is not Satoshi Nakamoto, the inventor of Bitcoin.
Craig Wright’s team initiated its closing submissions on Wednesday by rebutting the Crypto Amenable Patent Alliance’s fraudulence worries against Wright in a trial that is kit to situate out whether or not Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto, the inventor of Bitcoin.
Anthony Grabiner, Wright’s lawyer, hit previously at COPA’s conversation that unique signing sessions Wright organized to verify he was the Bitcoin owner possessed been overturned, proverb that zero proof possessed been offered.
He equally said that COPA’s witness Patrick Madden’s proof was inadmissible due to his ties with COPA. Madden possessed recommended that substantial quantities of of Wright’s dependence documents possessed been polluted “commonly with the conspicuous purpose of substantiating his claims,” a court document watched by CoinDesk showed.
Grabiner later added that in Wright’s counterclaim, he possessed not said that his dependence documents possessed never been edited.
COPA’s advise said in his closing news on Tuesday that the proof shared during the trial substantiates “past question” that Wright isn’t Satoshi. COPA’s reps equally said they strategy to ask U.K. prosecutors to ponder if the computer scientist perjured himself during the trial.
The results of the case can have repercussions on other existent tests against crypto bazaars and innovators.
Wright’s advise will expand offering their closing testament on Thursday.
Read added: COPA vs Wright: What’s at Threat as the Trial to Understand Satoshi’s Identification Envelops Up
